CSF 2.0 DE.CM-06 → PCI DSS v4.0

3 mapped controls · identifier-only informative references · Detect function · one implementation can answer several obligations at once.

What evidence answers both

Assessors working from either framework ask for the same thing against DE.CM-06: operational artifacts - alert and monitoring configuration exports, dated tuning records, sample detections with their triage outcome, and log-retention settings that prove coverage across the audit window. A PCI DSS assessor scopes to the cardholder data environment first, so the same artifact can satisfy a requirement inside scope and be irrelevant outside it - the mapping tells you where to look, not whether you are in scope. Keeping one dated evidence register per control means a single artifact answers both frameworks instead of being produced twice.

Stop redoing this mapping by hand.

AxiomLens is a GRC command deck you own outright. One-time license, per user — activate once, then it runs fully offline on your machine: your own database, 106 CSF 2.0 subcategories, computed coverage, evidence tied to controls, and board reports generated locally. It supports compliance documentation and audit-preparation workflows — it is a tool, not a certification or an assessment.

See AxiomLens →  ·  2-minute demo

Bayou Bytes
One email each Tuesday: the week’s threats that matter, one copy-paste hardening step, and the script to explain it to a non-technical stakeholder. Free, no pitch.

Subscribe